Don't Just Wave Goodbye: Why Monitoring Exiting Staff's Training is Crucial (and Why the "OG Crew" Matters)
- Cleverguide
- Jun 30
- 6 min read
The departure of an employee, whether through retirement or a two-week notice, is often met with a flurry of activity focused on finding a replacement. But amidst the hiring buzz, there's a critical step that often gets overlooked: ensuring the exiting staff effectively train their incumbent. Too often, we assume this vital knowledge transfer will happen seamlessly. The reality? It rarely does without a watchful eye, and the unspoken dynamics of the "OG crew" can play a surprisingly powerful role.
Think about it. An employee on their way out might be disengaged, overwhelmed, or even subtly protective of their knowledge. This isn't necessarily malicious; it's human nature. But it can lead to a significant loss of institutional knowledge, a bumpy transition for the new hire, and ultimately, a hit to your team's productivity and morale. And it's here that the existing team, the "OG crew," can inadvertently contribute to the problem.
The Hidden Risks of Unmonitored Training
When you don't actively monitor how your exiting staff are training their replacements, you run several risks:
Incomplete Knowledge Transfer: Critical procedures, undocumented workflows, and "tribal knowledge" can walk out the door forever.
Inefficient Onboarding: The new employee struggles to get up to speed, leading to frustration and extended ramp-up times.
Errors and Rework: Without proper training, the incumbent is more prone to mistakes, requiring others to pick up the slack.
Loss of Productivity: The team's overall output can dip as the new hire grapples with their responsibilities.
Damaged Morale: Both the new employee and the existing team can become disheartened by the lack of a smooth transition.
Security Vulnerabilities: In some roles, insufficient training could inadvertently create security gaps if processes aren't fully understood.
The "Spoon-Feeding" Trap: When Outgoing Employees Play it Safe
It's common for an outgoing employee to want to appear helpful and cooperative during their notice period. They might offer information, answer questions, and generally seem engaged in the training process. However, a subtle but significant issue can arise: "spoon-feeding" information.
This is when the exiting employee only provides information in response to specific questions, rather than proactively anticipating what the incumbent will need to know. They might offer just enough to answer the immediate query, hoping the incumbent doesn't dig deeper or ask the "right" follow-up questions that might expose gaps in their own documentation or less-than-ideal practices. It's a way of looking helpful without truly committing to a comprehensive knowledge transfer.
Instead, the exiting employee should be proactive in anticipating questions. They should think beyond the immediate task and consider the broader context, potential pitfalls, and unspoken nuances of the role. This means sharing not just "how to do X," but also "why we do X this way," "what usually goes wrong when you do X," and "who to contact if X goes sideways." When you see an outgoing employee merely reacting to questions, it's a red flag that they might be holding back or simply not thinking deeply enough about the incumbent's future needs.
The "OG Crew" Effect: Why Your Existing Team Might Unintentionally Cover Up Gaps
When we talk about the "OG Crew," we're referring to your Original Gang, your long-standing, established team members who have been with the organization for a significant period. They are the keepers of institutional memory, the informal leaders, and often the glue that holds the team together. While invaluable, their deep roots can lead to unintended complications during staff transitions.
When a long-standing employee is leaving, especially one with a lot of institutional knowledge, the "OG crew" might unintentionally become complicit in a less-than-thorough handoff. This isn't usually born of malice, but rather a complex mix of factors:
Loyalty and Camaraderie: The departing employee is a colleague, perhaps a friend. The "OG crew" has shared history, inside jokes, and a comfortable working rhythm. Criticizing the exiting employee's training efforts, or even highlighting their shortcomings, can feel like a betrayal of that loyalty. They might be inclined to say, "Oh, don't worry, we'll help you figure that out," rather than pushing the departing employee to document it properly.
Fear of Change and the Unknown: Even if the departing employee had their quirks or inefficiencies, their way of doing things was known. Change is inherently unsettling. The "OG crew" might consciously or unconsciously downplay the departing employee's knowledge gaps or inefficient processes because acknowledging them means they will have to adapt and potentially learn new ways of doing things themselves. It's easier to maintain the illusion that "everything is fine, we know how it works" than to face the effort of truly revamping a process.
Maintaining Their Own Value: Sometimes, the "OG crew" might possess unique knowledge or workarounds that they've developed over time to compensate for the departing employee's weaknesses or simply to make their own jobs easier. If the departing employee truly trained the incumbent perfectly, some of that "specialized" knowledge the "OG crew" holds might seem less critical, potentially diminishing their perceived value or control within the team.
Avoiding Conflict or Discomfort: It's uncomfortable to confront a departing colleague about incomplete training, especially when they're already on their way out. The path of least resistance is often to let things slide, assuming they'll just "pick up the slack" once the person is gone.
Underestimation of the Knowledge Gap: Having worked alongside the departing employee for so long, the "OG crew" might genuinely underestimate how much undocumented knowledge that person truly holds. What seems like common sense to them might be entirely new territory for an incumbent.
This collective unconscious "covering" can mean that critical information is never fully transferred, leaving the new hire to piece things together later, and putting a heavier burden on the "OG crew" to fill in the blanks in the long run.
What to Monitor: Key Areas for a Robust Handoff
To ensure a smooth and effective transition and to mitigate the "OG crew" effect, you need to actively oversee how an exiting employee trains their replacement. Focus on these critical areas:
Knowledge Capture: Is all essential operational and historical knowledge being effectively documented and transferred?
Relationship Continuity: Are vital internal and external stakeholder connections being properly introduced and transitioned?
System Proficiency: Is the new hire gaining the practical ability to navigate and utilize all critical systems and tools?
Workload Transfer: Are all ongoing projects and recurring tasks being thoroughly handed over with clear status and next steps?
Operational Resilience: Is the departing employee sharing insights into common challenges and problem-solving approaches for the role?
Cultural Integration: Is the incumbent being oriented to team norms and the unwritten aspects of your organizational culture?
Transition Support: Is a clear plan in place for ongoing support and questions after the exiting employee's departure?
Implementing a Monitoring Strategy (with the "OG Crew" in mind)
To effectively monitor this transition and explicitly address the "OG crew" dynamic, consider:
Structured Planning & Oversight: Develop a clear framework for the knowledge transfer process, ensuring management actively reviews progress.
Continuous Feedback Loops: Establish regular check-ins with both the incumbent and the manager to identify and address any training gaps. Create a safe environment for the new employee to provide candid feedback.
Strategic Team Engagement: Deliberately involve key "OG crew" members in the transition, assigning specific roles to ensure comprehensive knowledge transfer rather than relying on informal "covering."
Mandatory Knowledge Capture: Implement tools and processes to ensure all critical information is documented and centralized as a non-negotiable part of the exit. Encourage broader team contributions.
Validation & Assessment: Conduct structured assessments to verify the completeness and effectiveness of the knowledge transfer, potentially through independent "stress tests" of key processes.
Fostering Shared Responsibility: Emphasize to the entire team that a successful transition is a collective effort, benefiting everyone by maintaining productivity and team morale.
Don't Wait for the Exit: Be Proactive, or Call in the Experts
The ideal scenario is to have robust HR processes, Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs), and knowledge management systems in place long before any key employee considers leaving. Proactive documentation and continuous knowledge sharing mitigate the risks inherent in any departure.
However, if you're reading this because a key employee has just given notice, or you realize your current systems are lacking, it's not too late. This is precisely when you need an objective, experienced third party to step in. Firms like Consigliera Consulting specialize in streamlining HR functions, developing comprehensive SOPs, and managing exit strategies to ensure seamless knowledge transfer.
Their expertise can help you:
Objectively assess existing knowledge gaps that might be missed internally.
Implement structured knowledge transfer plans that go beyond simple "spoon-feeding."
Mediate and facilitate conversations to ensure critical information is shared, even when internal team dynamics create friction.
Develop robust, sustainable SOPs that minimize reliance on individual "tribal knowledge."
Provide strategic HR guidance to prepare your organization for future transitions, turning potential crises into smooth transitions.
Don't let valuable institutional knowledge walk out the door, or get buried under well-intentioned but ultimately unhelpful "covering" by your existing team. By actively monitoring how your exiting staff train their replacements, and by acknowledging and strategically engaging with the dynamics of your "OG crew," you're not just ensuring a smoother transition for the new hire; you're safeguarding your organization's efficiency, productivity, and long-term success. It's an investment that pays dividends for years to come.
Is your organization prepared for its next key employee transition, or could a proactive strategy make all the difference?
Comments